Experience From - Robert L. Rockwell, PhD , Steve Patt, Howie Stern, Rich Shick, Claudia Berryman-Shafer, Roy Morita, Robert Hills, Matt Mahoney#2, Earl Blewett, Timothy Lofton,
Also See: Water Purification Systems
With Particular Attention to the Sierra Nevada
By Robert L. Rockwell, PhD
NOTE: This article was borrowed from: http://www.yosemite.org/naturenotes/Giardia.htm#_edn32
Ask the average outdoors person about Giardia lamblia or giardiasis, and they have certainly heard about it. Almost always, however, they are considerably misinformed about both the organism’s prevalence in wilderness water, and the seriousness of the disease if contracted.
With the advent of the Internet, the amount of information one can easily find on the subject is voluminous. Unfortunately, most of it is flawed in important aspects, being unsubstantiated, anecdotal, or merely quoting other unsubstantiated and anecdotal articles. Official sources, such as many informational publications put out by the US government, are not immune to this criticism.
This paper is the result of a critical distillation of relevant articles, retaining only those from scholarly, peer-reviewed, or otherwise professional and trustworthy sources.
One conclusion of this paper is that you can indeed contract giardiasis on visits to the Sierra Nevada, but it won’t be from the water. So drink freely and confidently: Proper personal hygiene is far more important in avoiding giardiasis than treating the water.
First, an excerpt written by a highly regarded wilderness physician:
“In recent years, frantic alarms about the perils of giardiasis have aroused exaggerated concern about this infestation. Government agencies, particularly the United States Park Service and the National Forest Service, have filtered hundreds of gallons of water from wilderness streams, found one or two organisms (far less than enough to be infective), and erected garish signs proclaiming the water ‘hazardous.’” 
And another, by researchers who surveyed the health departments in all 50 states and scanned the medical literature looking for evidence that giardiasis is a significant threat to outdoor folk:
“Neither health department surveillance nor the medical literature supports the widely held perception that giardiasis is a significant risk to backpackers in the United States. In some respects, this situation resembles (the threat to beachgoers of a) shark attack: an extraordinarily rare event to which the public and press have seemingly devoted inappropriate attention.” 
I explored this subject in 1987  and again in 1996  with an update in 1997.  The conclusions have always been that the “Giardia problem” in Sierra Nevada water is grossly exaggerated, and that the cases of giardiasis subsequent to wilderness visits are wrongly blamed on the water. After incorporating the recent information for this paper, those prior conclusions are not only still valid but also considerably reinforced.
Just who is this little guy, anyway? , , , , 
Giardia lamblia, now also known as G. intestinalis or G. duodenalis, was first observed in 1681 by Anton van Leeuwenhoek, inventor of the microscope. The parasite was named in 1915 for two scientists who studied it: Prof. A. Giard in Paris and Dr. F. Lambl in Prague.
Giardia is a flagellated (having whip-like appendages for locomotion) protozoan that, in the trophozoite (active) form, attaches itself with an adhesive disk to the lining of the upper intestinal tract of the host animal. There, it feeds and reproduces. Trophozoites divide by binary fission about every 12 hours. Thus, a single parasite can theoretically result in more than a million in 10 days and a billion in 15 days.
At some time in its active life, the trophozoite releases its hold on the bowel wall and floats in the fecal stream. As it makes its journey, it transforms into an egg-like structure called a cyst, which is eventually passed in the stool. Duration of cyst excretion, called shedding, may persist for months. Once outside the body, the cysts can be ingested by another animal. Then, they “hatch” into trophozoites due to stomach acid action and digestive enzymes, and the cycle repeats.
The trophozoite is 9 - 15 microns long, 5 - 15 microns wide, and 2 - 4 microns thick. Unlike the cyst, it cannot live for long outside a host. Cysts are 8 - 12 microns long by 6 - 9 microns in diameter; so a million could fit under a fingernail. Cysts can survive for as long as 2 to 3 months in cold water,10,  but they cannot tolerate freezing. 9, 
A significant infestation can leave millions of trophozoites stuck tight to the intestinal lining. There, they cripple the gut’s ability to secrete enzymes and absorb food, especially fats, thereby producing the disease’s symptoms. The symptoms typically appear one to two weeks after ingestion, with an average of nine days, but four weeks is not uncommon. Symptoms can vanish suddenly and then reappear. They may hide for months. They may not appear at all. 10, 
There are three ways that giardiasis, the disease caused by ingesting Giardia cysts, can be contracted: contaminated water, contaminated food, and direct fecal-oral. A person who has just come down with the disease and who wishes to identify the source needs to reflect on not only the possibility of each of these, but in a suspect period ranging from typically one week to four weeks earlier.
The bad news: Giardia lamblia is almost everywhere 1, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, , , , , , 
Giardiasis has been most often associated with travel to such places as Latin America, Africa, Asia, and the former Soviet Union. However, Giardia has always been present in wilderness streams, in the water supplies of most cities around the world, and even in the municipal water of large US cities. In fact, in the 1930s and 1940s, before regulated municipal water treatment plants, everyone was drinking Giardia all the time. 
Currently, Giardia lamblia is the most commonly diagnosed intestinal parasite in North America.22 It is the most frequently identified cause of diarrheal outbreaks associated with drinking water in this country. Fully 20 percent of the world’s population is infected, and up to 7 percent of Americans, most without any symptoms at all. 10,  The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that as many as 2,500,000 cases occur annually in the US or almost one for every 100 persons. 
Infestation rates of 60 percent of the children in day care centers across the country have been noted. Institutions for mentally retarded persons can have high rates. Other high-rate populations include promiscuous male homosexuals, international travelers, and patients with cystic fibrosis. And family members of these individuals.
In an incident in New Jersey a child had a “fecal accident” in a 700,000-liter swimming pool, and nine swimmers came down with the disease.  How many Giardia cysts might have been involved? The number of cysts shed in feces is highly variable but has been estimated as high as 900 million per day for humans.
Municipal water utilities must use filters to remove the organism. San Francisco water, coming primarily from the Hetch Hetchy watershed in Yosemite National Park, has repeatedly tested positive for Giardia, although at very low levels: typically 0.12 cysts per liter [†]. This water is of such high quality that the US Environmental Protection Agency and the California Department of Health Services have granted Hetch Hetchy water a filtration exemption, meaning that filtration treatment to ensure its safety from Giardia and other organisms is not required The Los Angeles Aqueduct, which transports water to that city from the eastern slopes of the Sierra Nevada, averages 0.03 cysts per liter. 
Drinking highly contaminated water is one way to get the disease. Less common in developed countries is direct passage from stool to the hands of a food preparer and then to the food itself. When 16 people got sick from the salad at a Connecticut picnic, the CDC tracked the source to a woman who had mixed the salad with her hands. She didn’t have giardiasis, but one of her children did—without any symptoms.13 A similar situation occurred in New Jersey, with the salad preparer testing positive for Giardia along with her child and pet rabbit. 
Contaminated food may be a less-common source for the general population, but for wilderness visitors, it may be the most important one. Put another way: If the water is clean, food-borne and direct fecal-oral routes are the only pathways.
On a recent climbing expedition to Tibet, members of our party came down again and again with what was undoubtedly giardiasis. Our water came from glacial melt, but all our food in advanced base camp and below was prepared by Sherpa cooks. Much of the food they prepared—potatoes, rice, cauliflower, cabbage, onions—came from Nepal. We were continually assured that the cooks were practicing good hygiene, yet we had major intestinal problems that prevented many of the participants from getting high on the mountain.
The disease has been referred to as “beaver fever” because of a presumed link to those water-dwelling animals known to be carriers. However, it has been suggested that it is more likely that humans have carried the parasite into the wilderness and that beavers may actually be the victims. In particular, there is a growing amount of data showing that beavers living downstream from campgrounds have a high Giardia infection rate compared with a near-zero rate for beavers living in more remote areas.
In any case, beavers can and do contract giardiasis. Being water-dwellers, they are thus able to contaminate water more directly than an animal that defecates on the ground.
Other animals that
can harbor Giardia are bighorn sheep, cats, cattle, coyotes, deer, dogs,
elk, muskrats, pet rabbits, raccoons, and squirrels. And naturally occurring
infections have not been found in most wild animals including badgers, bears,
bobcats, ferrets, lynxes, marmots, moose, porcupines, rabbits, and skunks. In
the past, horses and domestic sheep were thought to be Giardia-free, but more
recent studies have shown that they can sometimes be infected.[12, 12A] , Indeed,
in some cases the issue seems to one of degree and not a black-or-white
If “It’s everywhere!” why is it not more of a problem?
The good news: Most of the time, the concentration of Giardia cysts is very low 1, 6, 8
Outside of places where dirty diapers congregate and cities where water treatment plants break down or are ineffective, there is little room to worry. A few Giardia cysts now and then will cause no harm and in fact may be useful in developing an immunity as will be expanded upon later.
How many cysts does it take to get the disease? Theoretically only one, but volunteer studies have shown that 10 or so are required to have a reasonable probability of contracting giardiasis: About one-third of persons ingesting 10 – 25 cysts get detectable cysts in their stools. 6, 7, 8, 10, , 
But be careful with statistics: Animal droppings containing 100,000 Giardia cysts deposited at the edge of a 10 million liter lake may be an average of only 0.01 per liter for the lake as a whole, but in the immediate vicinity of the deposit, the concentration can be much higher.
A comforting observation is that significant cyst inactivation, as high as 99.9 percent, can occur as a result of anaerobic digestion in sewage sludge.  Of course, using a simple cat hole is not exactly a good approximation to the sewage plant process, but this points out the wisdom of doing something better than just leaving it on the ground or under a rock. On the other hand, cysts perish in a day on dry surfaces, so smearing it over a rock slab makes some sense when burial is not feasible.
Since cysts that “winter over” in the Sierra Nevada are either in liquid water for considerably more than 2 to 3 months or exposed to freezing temperatures, it would appear that few will survive the harsh Sierra winters. So, except for pollution by winter mountaineers and non-hibernating animals, Giardia contamination in the high country must begin essentially anew each spring.
More good news: If you have a Giardia infestation, you will likely have no symptoms 1, 6, 7, 15, 16, , 
The symptoms of giardiasis vary widely. Characteristic symptoms, when they occur, are mild to moderate abdominal discomfort, abdominal distention due to increased intestinal gas, sulfurous or “rotten egg” burps, highly offensive flatulence, and mild to moderate diarrhea. Stools are soft (but not liquid), bulky, and foul smelling. They have been described as greasy and frothy, and they float on the surface of water. Nausea, weakness, and loss of appetite may occur. Studies have shown that giardiasis can be suspected when the illness lasts seven or more days with at least two of the above symptoms.7
However, most infected individuals have no symptoms at all! In one incident1 studied by the CDC, disruption in a major city’s water disinfection system allowed the entire population to consume water heavily contaminated with Giardia. Yet only 11 percent of the exposed population developed symptoms even though 46 percent had organisms in their stools. These figures suggest that (a) even when ingesting large amounts of the parasite, the chance of contracting giardiasis is less than 1 in 2, and (b) if you are one of the unlucky ones to contract it, the chance of having symptoms is less than 1 in 4. But perhaps the most telling statistic is that drinking heavily contaminated water resulted in symptoms of giardiasis in only 1 case in 9.
If you have symptoms it may not be giardiasis 1, 7, 13, 16, 
Many people claim that they “got it” on a particular trip into the wilderness. Yet upon questioning, they usually report that the presence of Giardia was not confirmed in the laboratory. (Only 8 percent of persons with a diarrheal illness in this country seek medical care.22) Depending on the situation, other possible offenders are Campylobacter, Cryptosporidium, Salmonella, Shigella, Yersinia, Aeromonas, Clostridium, and Escherichia coli, with the last being the most common cause of traveler’s diarrhea worldwide. Food poisoning is also a possibility.
Cryptosporidiosis, in particular, is a growing problem in this country, and currently, there is no effective treatment for it. An outbreak in Milwaukee in 1993 caused 403,000 people to become ill and 100 to die. A year later, 43 people in Las Vegas died from the same disease.  The severity of cryptosporidiosis depends on the condition of the host’s immune system. In immunologically normal people, symptoms and duration are similar to those of giardiasis. But in persons whose immune systems have been compromised (e.g., AIDS victims), symptoms can be profound: Frequent (6 to 25), voluminous (1 to 25 liters) daily bowel movements, serious weight loss, and cyst shedding often persist for months.
The diarrhea being blamed on Giardia from that climbing trip a week ago may instead be due to some spoiled food eaten last night or Campylobacter in undercooked chicken four days ago. Or because the incubation period is usually from one to four weeks, even if it is giardiasis the uncertainty range indicates that the culprits could have been ingested anytime during a full three weeks worth of meals and beverages. People in high-risk groups for Giardia, such as family members of children in day care centers or promiscuous male homosexuals, have even more possible sources to consider. To indict a particular stream or lake under such circumstances, without being able to at least verify that cysts are indeed there at all, is illogical at best.
The type of diarrhea can help in the diagnosis: If it is liquid and mixes readily with water rather than floating on top and is not particularly foul smelling, the problem is likely something other than giardiasis. Diarrhea which lasts less than a week, untreated, is probably not from giardiasis.
Almost always, giardiasis goes away without treatment 1, 6, 7, 13, 14, 15, 30, 
If you are unlucky enough to get giardiasis with symptoms, the symptoms will probably go away in a week or so without treatment. You may still be harboring the cysts, however, and can unknowingly spread the disease. Thus, practicing commonly recommended wilderness sanitary habits—defecating 100 feet from water, burying or packing out feces and toilet paper, washing before handling food, etc.—is an excellent idea.
The US Food and Drug Administration, observing that giardiasis is more prevalent in children than adults, suggests that many individuals seem to have a lasting immunity after infection.  Furthermore, citizens of cities and countries where the parasite is numerous clearly seem to have few if any problems with their own water, which also points to an acquired immunity. So there is a possible bright side to contracting the disease.
Looking for cysts and trophozoites in stool specimens under the microscopic has been the traditional method for diagnosing giardiasis, but it is notoriously unreliable. Now, however, an immunologic test (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, or ELISA) for the detection of Giardia antigens in stool samples is available. The antigens are present only if there is a Giardia infection. ELISA is a big improvement over the microscopic search, with detection sensitivities of 90 percent or more.
Rare individuals not only do not spontaneously rid themselves of the organisms but instead develop serious symptoms of malabsorption, weight loss, ulcer-like stomach pain, and other chronic disturbances. Fortunately, this occurs in fewer than 1 percent of those with infestations. These unlucky people need medical treatment.
Metronidazole (Flagyl) has been the standard medication, with about a 92 percent cure rate. Recommended by the CDC, it is not approved by the FDA for giardiasis because it can have some serious side effects and is potentially carcinogenic. Quinacrine (Atabrine) and furazolidone (Furoxone) are also prescribed. Tinidazole (Tinebah) is highly effective in single doses and is widely used throughout the world, but it is not available in the US; it can be purchased over-the-counter in many developing countries.7, 22
Giardiasis has been called a disease of “somes.” Some people do not contract it even from heavily contaminated sources. Some infestations vanish with no treatment at all. Some people become asymptomatic carriers. Some evidence suggests that some people acquire a natural immunity to some strains. And some strains seem more virulent than others.13
The problem may not be whether you are infected with the parasite but how harmoniously you both can live together. And how to get rid of the parasite when the harmony does not exist or is lost.6
So, what about the Sierra Nevada? 1, 6, 7, 8, 14, 16
In 1984, the US Geological Survey in cooperation with the California Department of Public Health examined water at 69 Sierra Nevada stream sites that were selected in consultation with Park Service and National Forest managers. [36, 36A] Forty-two of the stream sites were considered “high-use” (high probability of human fecal contamination), and 27 were “low-use.” Cysts were found at only 18 (43 percent) of the high-use sites and at 5 (19 percent) of the low-use sites. The highest concentration of Giardia cysts was 0.108 per liter of water in Susie Lake, south of Lake Tahoe. The next highest was 0.037 per liter near Long Lake, southwest of Bishop. Samples taken in the Mt. Whitney area varied from 0 (most sites) to 0.013 (Lone Pine Creek at Trail Camp) per liter. The concentration was 0.003 per liter in Lone Pine Creek at Whitney Portal.
Recall that San Francisco water can contain a concentration of 0.12 cysts per liter,24 a figure now seen to be higher than that measured anywhere in the Sierra. San Francisco city officials go to great lengths to assure their citizens that the water is safe to drink, and if true—as it most assuredly must be—this comparison alone is quite revealing.
Even Los Angeles Aqueduct water, with only 0.03 cysts per liter,25 has a higher concentration of Giardia than all but two of the 69 Sierra sites examined.
Taking the highest concentration measured in the Sierra (0.108), we can make some calculations. The probability [‡] of finding 10 or more cysts in a liter of water—to have at least a one-third chance of contracting giardiasis—is about 10-17. Ten cysts in 10 liters of water, about 10-7. In fact, one would have to drink over 89 liters to have a 50 percent probability of ingesting 10 or more cysts.
A word of caution: The concentration is never uniform, as suggested by the “lake incident” above.
Another reason for caution: 1984 was some time ago, and areas of the Sierra may be differently contaminated now: perhaps more, perhaps less. Also, while so much attention is being given to Giardia, there are worse organisms to worry about such as Campylobacter, Cryptosporidium, E. coli, and the other organisms mentioned earlier.
In an informative study,  investigators contacted thousands of visitors to one of the high-use sites during the summers of 1988 through 1990. Water samples taken on 10 different dates at each of three locations exhibited Giardia cyst concentrations between 0 and 0.062 (average 0.009) per liter. A goal was to enlist volunteers who were cyst-negative before their trip, verified by stool analysis, and then determine what fraction were cyst carriers after the trip. Unfortunately, stool collection is not a particularly enjoyable task, and only 41 people agreed to participate. Of these, two acquired Giardia cysts during their trip, but neither came down with symptoms. Six of the others exhibited post-visit intestinal symptoms, but none tested positive for Giardia (interestingly, all six had filtered their water). In sum, no cases of laboratory-confirmed symptomatic giardiasis were found.
The water that wilderness travelers are apt to drink, assuming that they use a little care, seems almost universally safe as far as Giardia is concerned. The study referred to earlier,2 in which the researchers concluded that the risk of contracting giardiasis in the wilderness is similar to that of a shark attack, is telling. What they did find is that Giardia and other intestinal bugs are for the most part spread by direct fecal-oral or food-borne transmission, not by contaminated drinking water. Since personal hygiene often takes a backseat when camping, the possibility of contracting giardiasis from someone in your own party—someone who is asymptomatic, probably—is real. Recalling that up to 7 percent of Americans, or 1 in 14, are infected, it is not surprising that wilderness visitors can indeed come home with a case of giardiasis contracted not from the water…but from one of their friends.
This theme, that reduced attention to personal hygiene is an important factor for contracting giardiasis in the wilderness, is becoming more frequent in the literature.2, 10, 14, 37, 
Outside of the Sierra, Giardia cysts in concentrations “as high as four per gallon [§]” have been detected in untreated water in northeastern and western states.  But even with this concentration, one would have to consume over nine liters of water to have a 50 percent chance of ingesting 10 or more cysts.
Indeed, there may be as much unwarranted hysteria surrounding Giardia in wilderness water in these other areas as there is for the Sierra. For example, an oft-cited report describing acquisition of the disease by 65 percent of a group of students hiking in the Uinta Mountains of Utah  is now viewed with considerable skepticism. Specifically, the attack rate was far beyond that usually seen with water-contracted giardiasis, no cysts were identified in the suspect water, there was no association between water consumption rates and the likelihood of the disease, and the authors categorically discounted food-borne or fecal-oral spread, stating that it had never been reported (correct at the time).2
I started visiting the Sierra Nevada in the early 1950s and have spent much of my free time there. I have never treated the water, and I have never had symptoms of giardiasis as a consequence of my visits. My many similarly active friends and acquaintances also drink the water with no ill effects. But because of other organisms possibly present, we are always careful to “drink smart”:
If in doubt, treat it—but how? While useful in many instances, chlorine is not in general effective for Giardia disinfection, which is why swimming pools are primary sources for the disease. The best filters work, although they are costly, heavy, and bulky, and many are somewhat awkward to use.8, 
Boiling is usually inconvenient, but if you are preparing hot water for meals anyway, you may as well take advantage. Giardia cysts are highly susceptible to heat, and simply bringing water to 150° F. for five minutes,10 to 176° for a minute,8 or 190° momentarily, will kill them. But boiling for a few minutes at altitude is usually recommended because of the other organisms that may be present. At 10,000 feet elevation, water boils at 194°; at 14,000 feet, 187°.
Iodine is probably the best treatment choice, being inexpensive, convenient, and safe. Iodine is effective against most bacteria and viruses, too—and over a wide range of temperatures. (But Cryptosporidium may be resistant to iodine.) A popular system uses iodine crystals in a saturated water solution. Methods exist to mask or remove the iodine taste.
Here are some of the Giardia cyst concentrations discussed in various places above. Units are cysts per liter.
In a recent letter  the Supervisor of the Inyo National Forest admitted: “As to whether or not Giardia exists in the Sierra, we are not in a position to state a fact one way or the other.” This is a significant admission. So why do they persist in informing everyone that giardiasis is a potential hazard when visiting the Sierra Nevada?
First: They know that some waters might be contaminated by something, and Giardia is the organism on people’s minds so needs no elaboration. Contaminated water is certainly possible at lower elevations and in some locales. Noting in particular that novice hikers cannot be expected to make correct choices of which sources may be safe to drink, they point out that a conservative approach is to treat all water.
Second: If a person believes, albeit incorrectly, that they contracted giardiasis from Sierra Nevada water, they cannot accuse the Forest Service of not warning them. Potential confrontations are therefore avoided.
Unfortunately, this approach results in an incorrect perception of overall water quality in the Sierra by the general public. It also means that if someone contracts a gastrointestinal illness after a visit, they will be more apt to blame the water, having been “forewarned” that all water is suspect. And so the myth is perpetuated.
Untreated Sierra Nevada water should be, almost everywhere, safe to drink—if you “drink smart.” If you don’t “drink smart” you may ingest diarrhea-causing organisms. But it won’t be Giardia.
Because up to 1 in 14 of us carries the Giardia parasite, we all need to do what we can to keep the water pure. Defecate away from water, and bury it or carry it out.
Camp cooks in particular need to pay special attention to cleanliness. Wash hands thoroughly, especially before handling utensils and preparing meals. If you contract giardiasis in the backcountry, blame your friends…not the water.
High Sierra water has far too few Giardia cysts for you to contract an infestation from it. Even if you go somewhere where the concentration is high, you probably won't get giardiasis. If you do get giardiasis, you probably won't have any symptoms. If you have symptoms, they will probably go away by themselves in a week or so. If they don't or you develop serious persistent symptoms, you should seek medical treatment. Finally, those contracting giardiasis may develop immunity to it, thus lowering the likelihood that they will get it again.
There is certainly no reason for anxiety about giardiasis. Fewer than 1 percent of those who have an infestation, or about 5 percent of those with symptoms, need medical help.
Our wilderness managers are in a position to educate the outdoor public about the real culprit in the Giardia lamblia story: inadequate human hygiene. When they acknowledge that Sierra Nevada water has fewer Giardia cysts than, for example, the municipal water supply of the city of San Francisco, maybe they will turn their attention to it.
The thrust of the following observation is long overdue:
“Given the casual approach to personal hygiene that characterizes most backpacking treks, hand washing is likely to be a much more useful preventative strategy than water disinfection! [††] This simple expedient, strictly enforced in health care, child care, and food service settings, is rarely mentioned in wilderness education materials.” 2
About the author
Bob Rockwell is an active mountaineer who made his first trip into the Sierra Nevada in 1952 to climb Mt. Whitney, and he repeats this climb several times annually. He has a bachelor's degree in Physics from UC-Berkeley, and a PhD in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering (Biomechanics) from Stanford. In the course of making over a thousand ascents of hundreds of individual Sierra Nevada mountains, he has never filtered or otherwise treated the water and he has never contracted symptoms of giardiasis. Retired since 1990, he is now able to fully indulge in his favorite pastime and spends more time there, never treating the water, than ever before.
[†] The referenced sources use a variety of units for portraying cyst concentration: cysts per 100 liters, per 100 gallons, etc. For uniformity, all have been converted to cysts per liter since that is the size of the typical backpacker’s canteen.
 Wilkerson, James
A., MD: Medicine for Mountaineering and Other Wilderness Activities. The
Mountaineers, 4th edition, 1992
 Welch, Thomas R. and Welch, Timothy P.: Giardiasis as a Threat to Backpackers in the United States: A Survey of State Health Departments. Wilderness and Environmental Medicine, Vol. 6, 1995
 Rockwell, Bob: Giardiasis: Let’s Be Rational About It. Summit Magazine, Nov.-Dec. 1987
 Olsen, M. E., et al: Survival of
Giardia Cysts and Cryptosporidium Oocysts in Water, Soil and Cattle Feces.
American Association of Veterinary Parasitologists, 43rd Annual
[12A] Giardia and Cryptosporidium Levels are Low in Sierra Nevada Pack Stock. University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources News Tips, December 1999
Ziegfried, chief microbiologist at the EPA. Quoted in Backpacker, Dec.
 Kappus KD, Lundgren RG and Juranek DD: Intestinal Parasitism in the United States: Update on a Continuing Problem. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. Vol. 60 no. 6, 1994
 Annual Water Quality Report for 2000. Los Angeles Department of Water and Power
 Cravaghan, P. D., et al: Inactivation
of Giardia by Anaerobic Digestion of Sludge. Water Science Technology, Vol.
 Mayo Clinic Family Health Book. Mayo Clinic Foundation for Medical Education and Research, 1996
 Tintinalli, J. et al, editors: Parasites: Giardia Lamblia. Emergency Medicine, 3rd edition, 1995
 Zell, S. C. and Sorenson, S. K.: Cyst
Acquisition Rate for Giardia Lamblia in Backcountry Travelers to Desolation
Wilderness, Lake Tahoe. Journal of Wilderness Medicine, No. 4, 1993
 Giardiasis Fact Sheet. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, May 2001
 Ongerth, J. E. et al: Backcountry
Water Treatment to Prevent Giardiasis. American Journal of Public Health,
Vol. 79 no. 12, 1989
 Barbour, A. G. et al: An Outbreak of Giardiasis in a Group of Campers. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Vol. 25, 1976
 Gorman, Stephen: Mountaincraft: Water Treatment. Summit Magazine, Fall 1993
 Bailey, Jeffrey E., Forest Supervisor, Inyo National Forest. Personal correspondence, November 19, 2001
"An excellent article regarding Giardia in the Sierra Nevada can be found at: http://www.yosemite.org/naturenotes/Giardia.htm. The gist of it is that Sierra Nevada water is NOT contaminated with Giardia. It has convinced me to do away with my water filter on long runs in the high country around Lake Tahoe."
I read the whole article, which WAS convincing about Giardia, indicating that the typical concentration in Sierra streams is less than in San Francisco drinking water.
HOWEVER, at the same time it discusses OTHER contaminants, like Cryptospiridium, without additional quantification. Portions of the article read like they were written by the Giardia Anti-Discrimination League, basically saying, "if you do get sick, it probably wasn't Giardia but something else." Fine. I'm sure that will make you feel a lot better. ;-)
Note also that the author proudly claims to have been drinking water in the Sierras for 50 years and never gotten sick, BUT he ALSO notes that he is always careful to "drink smart": drinking from large, fast-flowing streams, drinking from lakes only at the inlet, etc. He also has a number of serious warnings, like being more careful in summer or fall than in spring, being cautious in "dry years", etc.
In high altitudes and away from humans and most animals you're pretty darn safe, that message is clear from the article, and the likelihood of getting sick is a lot less than most people think, that message is also clear. It still sounds to me like most people (and dogs), in most circumstances, would be taking an unnecessary chance drinking untreated water from most locations.
Well, I live in the Sierra Nevada up in Mammoth. I'm careful, almost always use a filter and I've still gotten Giardia three times. I still recommend using a filter. Personally I use a water bottle filter so carrying anything extra is a non-issue.
I thought that after you get Giardia once, you can't get it again, assuming you let your immune system take care of it instead of taking drugs to cure it. Anyway that's what I always assumed after I got it in 1995 after drinking from streams in Laurel Highlands and not letting the iodine tablets dissolve long enough (you are supposed to wait 20 minutes but I waited 1 minute because I was thirsty). Anyway it was no big deal, just some loose stools and more gas than usual for a couple of weeks, and then it went away. It is not like the plague or anything.
After that I never bothered to treat water any more and haven't had any problems since then. I always drink untreated stream water in the Colorado mountains every summer for about a month, and also have had no problems with mountain stream water in CA (WS100 course), MN (Superior trail), VA (Massanutten) or TN (Frozen Head).
With all the talk on water and the nastiness that you might get from enjoying wilderness runs I thought the following might be of interest. Discussion and Personal Preferences Trekkers visit Nepal in huge numbers, and have a significant impact on the environment here. There are some important steps they can take to minimize this negative impact. Using bottled water in remote areas is unsupportable. It results in a terrible waste problem with non-reusable, non-biodegradable plastic bottles. Boiling water requires heat, which may be from a kerosene stove or dried yak dung, but is often in the form of a wood fire. Burning wood = deforestation in many of these fragile mountainous areas. For this reason I encourage trekkers to enjoy hot drinks in the tea houses, but not ask for boiled water to fill their water bottles. Filters do not do an adequate job of disinfect ion, and so I see no point in spending money on them or taking up valuable backpack space carrying them. I recommend iodine as the treatment of choice, unless there are contraindications to its use. My own preference is to use Betadine® (10% povidone-iodine) in a small dropper bottle, and a one liter nalgene bottle. I fill up the bottle from a stream, drop in 4 drops of Betadine®, screw on the lid, and put it in my pack. Half an hour later, it is ready to drink. With minimal planning ahead, I rarely need water faster than this. I like this system because I carry Betadine® in my first aid kit anyway, and I personally think the flavor is less noxious than some other forms of iodine. I don't usually feel the need to add flavor crystals to my water, rather I joke that iodine is "the taste of safety." A little goes a long way: 30 ml of Betadine® is enough to disinfect 150 liters of water, or drinking water for about 50 days of active trekking (I am presuming that some additional fluid intake exists from tea, soup, meals, etc.). I encourage trekkers to try a "taste test" at home with the various forms of iodine to determine which form tastes least bad, what strength they can tolerate (balanced against the necessary contact time), and whether they need to plan on carrying bulky flavoring crystals. Try the vitamin C trick!
As I have mentioned before I personally use Clorox at 3 drops per 20 - 30 oz of water. Theoretically not as effective as iodine, but I have never gotten sick either in the US or in Europe. If I were in some Asian Areas I would probably bite the bullet and use the iodine - I hate the flavor of iodine, no other reason not to use it for me.
References: (1) Tellier R, and Keystone JS: Prevention of Traveler's Diarrhea. Inf Disease Clinics of North America, June 1992; 6 (2):333-354. (2) Backer HD: Field Water Disinfection. In: Auerbach PS (ed): Wilderness Medicine: Management of Wilderness and Environmental Emergencies, 3rd Edition. Mosby, St. Louis, 1995.
The most sick I have ever been was after a backpack trip in the Emigrant Wilderness, north of Yosemite, and drank without treating water which I thought was not necessary in the Sierras. I tested positive for Giardia. I always treat my water now.
I thought that after you get Giardia once, you can't get it again, assuming you let your immune system take care of it instead of taking drugs to cure it.
This is very interesting. I'm not a doctor and don't even play one on TV. So I don't know much about this sort of thing but isn't Giardia a bacterial infection? If so, can you really get immune to it? I always thought that you can only get immune to the viral infection.
Or maybe you are just lucky, Matt.
Giardia is caused by a protozoan, not a bacteria.
I think Giardia is a parasite, not a bacteria or virus. Anyway I understand that 60% of people infected have no symptoms, 30% have mild symptoms (that was me), and 10% have severe symptoms. But the immune system must work on parasites too (and bacteria). Why is it that Mexicans can drink their own water and not get sick like Americans do? Why is it that every species of animal except Homo Sapiens can drink untreated water?
I am a Doctor (and a microbiologist). Giardia is not a bacterial infection, it is a flagellate protozoan.
Giardia lamblia is the infectious agent.
As for immunity. I spent summers in northern Canada where it is endemic and have had giardiasis many times. You develop an immunity that reduces the severity of disease. If you ingest enough cysts you will still likely get sick. It only takes about 10 cysts to start an infection in a naive host.
Note that 50% of infected people are totally asymptomatic. I picked up Giardia in 1992 on a canoe trip in northern Saskatchewan. The person with me never developed symptoms. I only noticed it because it affected my running. If I ran more than 40 minutes I would bloat. That and farts that would gag a buzzard. It takes about 2 weeks for symptoms to develop.
I drank from a stream in the 1998 Elkhorn Mountain 100 km (Montana) and got a pretty severe case. It only was a problem doing endurance events though. I would get cramps. I remember blessing nOrm for the portapotties that year at Sunmart. I did a trail run in Kansas and had a tough time trying to find a bush on the prairie.
The disease eventually subsided. I was stupid and didn't want to take Flagil or another drug because they have some side effects. It would have saved me a lot of unpleasantness if I'd gone and gotten a prescription.
Immunity is part of the bodies adaptive response. If T and B cells are exposed to something they think is foreign they react to them.
You can develop immunity to protein, carbohydrate and all kinds of molecules, including self. It isn't limited to viruses or bacteria.Earl L Blewett, PhD
Ditto what Dr. Blewett stated. Response to Giardia is primarily mediated by IgA, and thus a "learned or memory" response can occur upon subsequent exposure, but is not foolproof, especially if exposed to sufficient cyst numbers. Also, here is a fairly recent link to a paper describing some of the mechanisms involved:
Timothy E. Lofton Research Associate III Cancer Pharmacology Amgen Seattle-WA